Cultural perspectives on ecological design : spacial evaluations of the Grover Building, open space on campus and classrooms.
(Book - Regular Print)
Published
Prescott, AZ : The Authors, 2000.
Physical Desc
various paging : illustrations, (mostly color) ; 28 cm.
Status
Prescott College - CIRCCOLL - Circulating Collection
AC3.5.C86 2000
1 available
AC3.5.C86 2000
1 available
More Details
Published
Prescott, AZ : The Authors, 2000.
Format
Book - Regular Print
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Contains Power Point presentation images.
General Note
Introduction by Dana Oswald --- An Evaluation of the Grover Building by Sarah Fitzgerald, Nate Gabriel, Melissa Giacchino and Keity Irving --- An Evaluation of Outside Space by Brooke Witteman, Newt Lynn, Jacob Gaventa and Kate Crosby --- Proposal for New Classrooms by Joshua Baker, Liz Padgett and Sarah Malick.
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
Copies
Location | Call Number | Status |
---|---|---|
Prescott College - CIRCCOLL - Circulating Collection | AC3.5.C86 2000 | Find It Now |
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
(2000). Cultural perspectives on ecological design: spacial evaluations of the Grover Building, open space on campus and classrooms . The Authors.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)2000. Cultural Perspectives On Ecological Design: Spacial Evaluations of the Grover Building, Open Space On Campus and Classrooms. The Authors.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Cultural Perspectives On Ecological Design: Spacial Evaluations of the Grover Building, Open Space On Campus and Classrooms The Authors, 2000.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Cultural Perspectives On Ecological Design: Spacial Evaluations of the Grover Building, Open Space On Campus and Classrooms The Authors, 2000.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Loading Staff View.